Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Nereis.gif

Image:Nereis.gif, not featured

•  Info This is an animation of the movement of the parapods of an epitoke Nereis succinea. It was created, uploaded and nominated by Lycaon -- Lycaon 13:56, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Epitoke means the reproductive form. They come swarming to the surface synchronized by the phases of the moon.

•  Support --Lycaon 13:56, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose It's only idiotically shaking, not moving - don't present anything very well. --Beyond silence 16:11, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

• NACK, animation WFM --Richard Bartz 16:30, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
• agreed 100% NACK. ..Richard what do you mean with WFM? --AngMoKio 16:41, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

• Works For Me --Richard Bartz 17:42, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

• Thanks :) --AngMoKio 17:50, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

• I will gracefully disregard that remark Beyond silence. Lycaon 19:25, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

•  Neutral  Support quality is great. Things i am not sure abt are: 1) Is gif the right filetype for such animations? 2) A explanation in the summary telling what this animal is doing there would be helpful. Is it constantly moving this way or is it sth special that it is doing? --AngMoKio 16:46, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

• I added some more text to the information section of the image. Lycaon 19:25, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

•  Oppose ack Beyond Silence. Catching it moving forward would be better. --JaGa 17:33, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

• It doesn't move forward out of the sediment as it has nothing to push against. Lycaon 19:25, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

•  Neutral Hypnotic, yet if it's an animation to show how it moves forward this really doesn't illustrate that very well. Sorry. Calibas 19:55, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose ac Beyond silence --Lestat 17:26, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Why do you never give reasons when you oppose? --MichaelMaggs 21:54, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

•  Oppose per AngMoKio --Pumpmeup 04:00, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Nice quality, but animation could be smoother (though I'm not sure how you could have achieved this). I think it's fairly good enough for FP (unless someone can do better...). Benh 18:00, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Cecil 03:43, 31 October 2007 (UTC)