Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Ritzelpaket 01 KMJ.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Ritzelpaket 01 KMJ.jpg, featured
[edit]- Info created by KMJ - uploaded by Chris 73 - nominated by Thgoiter ⇔ 13:12, 18 June 2006 (UTC)]]
- Support excellent, wow --Thgoiter ⇔ 13:12, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support — Unusual. Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 13:24, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
- Neutral Technically and esthetically, it's a really good photo but, for my taste, the subject is not strong enough (a common object can have an important evocative strength if it recalls essential feelings, and this one doesn't for me). El ComandanteHasta ∞ 13:53, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support --ßøuñçêY2K 17:53, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Teme 08:32, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support Jon Harald Søby 09:22, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- Neutral ditto El Comandante and res is quite low --Rodge 16:10, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose --Ggonnell 10:46, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Neutral can the name on it be photoshoped out.--Tarawneh 14:17, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - why? The name of the manufacturer is important to the item. We would not remove the manufacturer's mark from e.g. a photo of a car - MPF
- Sorry, why is the name of the manufacturer is important to the item. This is a Featured Picture candidate. Having a manufacturer name in such photo is free advertisement in my opinion, same product is manufactured by others. Cars are different, you don't need to read the name on the car to know the manufacturer, at least for most of people. There is a hidden massage in such a photo; Products labeled with SRAM are good. --Tarawneh 02:40, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support - MPF 13:06, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Overlord 14:14, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support --New Painter 15:41, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support -- Lerdsuwa 15:28, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support --- gildemax 21:10, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Agree --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 12:25, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Wmeinhart 19:45, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose low resolution — Lycaon 07:50, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Voting ended on 13:12, 3 July 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid
Support --Doruk Salancı 12:14, 4 July 2006 (UTC)Lycaon 06:27, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Result: 12 Support, 2 Oppose and 3 Neutral => featured. -- Lycaon 21:48, 7 July 2006 (UTC)