Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:River in harrietville trout farm.jpg

Self Nom --Fir0002 www 23:51, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support, nice mood, good overall sharpness, like the long exposure. But the tree in front has an eerie glow to it, how comes? --Dschwen 00:03, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Expousre bracket :-) - that was the effect I was aiming at --Fir0002 www 00:35, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The water looks unnatural, which could easily be avoided by a shorter exposure time. MGo 09:32, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose yes, the water looks unnatural (IMO) - YolanC 18:36, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The whole picture looks unnatural to me (oversaturated colors, long exposure time). Rex 22:38, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it by the same things Rex dislikes, plus the framing. Francisco M. Marzoa 05:24, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Forests are usually dark, so if you want a natural water, everything else would be too dark to be discernible.--Wing-Chi 00:58, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - agree with MGo - MPF 21:52, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Nice, but.. Too artsy. No categories. No meaningful description => hardly usable. --Wikimol 00:00, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The Wikimedia Commons featured pictures are not an artistic category, but an informative one, the long exposure does not make it any more informative. Freedom to share 07:55, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Freedom to share 15:03, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I like the long exposure. But I agree with Wikimol, what should it be used for ? --Daniel78

4 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral --> not featured Roger McLassus 22:18, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu