Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Strawberry444.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Strawberry444.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Info Benjamint 09:09, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Support Benjamint 09:09, 5 December 2007 (UTC)- Support --Aqwis 11:14, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Oppose for now. The shadow is not clean. Perhaps without it, or with an other format (png, or svg). Sémhur 19:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Neutral That's better, but as it's said below, there is too much white margins. Sémhur 16:15, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, sure this is a great picture, but the shadow has issues and a studio shot needs to be greater than 1600x1200. -- Ram-Man 22:50, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Done Shadow fixed and minimized. It's within the res limit, the guidelines don't mention anything about certain subjects needing a higher resolution than others. Benjamint 09:25, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Regarding size, it is a guideline and it also says that For 'easy to take' images, reviewers may choose to demand more if the image would benefit from it., and I guess this is what Ram-Man is referring to. -- Slaunger 11:21, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I demand more than the bare minimum when it comes to studio shots. We're trying to build a collection of best possible, not merely adequate images. This image could conceivably be redone by another photographer with little effort and larger resolution, thus it is not special enough for me. -- Ram-Man 12:40, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- But until someone does take a better picture, is this our best studio shot of a strawberry? Regards, Ben Aveling 08:03, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- It is the best studio shot currently available, but if we have to feature every 'best' shot of every item available on Commons, then we're not done yet... ;-). Lycaon 08:23, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- But until someone does take a better picture, is this our best studio shot of a strawberry? Regards, Ben Aveling 08:03, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- I have to agree with Ram-Man. Moreover 50% of the picture is pure white, so one could argue that the image is only 1Mpx. The technique and the quality however, are quite good, so please provide us with a huge STRAWBERRY ;-). Lycaon 15:42, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I demand more than the bare minimum when it comes to studio shots. We're trying to build a collection of best possible, not merely adequate images. This image could conceivably be redone by another photographer with little effort and larger resolution, thus it is not special enough for me. -- Ram-Man 12:40, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Regarding size, it is a guideline and it also says that For 'easy to take' images, reviewers may choose to demand more if the image would benefit from it., and I guess this is what Ram-Man is referring to. -- Slaunger 11:21, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Neutral Great shot. I'd support a version with higher resolution. I took the liberty of editing the cats on the image page, see my edit summaries. -- Slaunger 22:38, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 10:27, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
