Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Une guêpe sur son nid en papier.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
image:Une guêpe sur son nid en papier.jpg, not featured
[edit]Original version | Version with noise reduction |
Original version, not featured
[edit]- Info created and uploaded by J-Luc - nominated by J-Luc 15:52, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- Support --J-Luc 15:52, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- Info The same wasp, taken this afternoon. I have tried to take care about the noise (400ASA), the sun (taken in the shadow), the composition. Made 100, kept only 1... :-)
- Support Vassil 23:47, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- Support--João Carvalho 14:43, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose I really like this picture, especially the colors. I can not understand why you cutted the wing. In my eyes the cutted wing destroys the whole picture. A hard decission for me. --Makro Freak 08:17, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Info I have used a tripod, it was centered on the wasp "looking" at me. Suddendly, she took this position and I was happy to have it "3/4" but did not have the time to unscrew/reposition the tripod, I "forced" the tripod to change the composition and I took care not to crop the antennas (first plane) but sorry for the wing. Ok for the "noise" but I don't see a lot of noise on the EOS20D at 400ISO...
See reponse below... (J-Luc)
result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 07:45, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Version with noise reduction, not fearured
[edit]- Info The background is so far oof that it's easy to remove the noise from it --MichaD | Michael Apel 21:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- Support --MichaD | Michael Apel 21:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- Support Vassil 22:04, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose dont like the crop --Bergwolf 22:16, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose I really like this picture, especially the colors. I can not understand why you cutted the wing. In my eyes the cutted wing destroys the whole picture. A hard decission for me. --Makro Freak 08:16, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Info - Several "quality images" are croped. A very little part of my wasp wing is missing, but these are example where the crop is sometimes more important. The rules must be the same for everybody.
- Comment None of the example pictures would get support from me. You cannot fit this cropping thing in rules. This is a personal aspect. --Makro Freak talk 11:55, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Info - Ok, I give up. I am afraid that technical aspects are more important that emotional and artistic considerations.
- Comment Spoken for me, it should have both. --Makro Freak talk 15:46, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Info - I agree, but keep in mind that it is amateur work... (J-Luc)
- I allways have this in my mind. If you post this whole FP List onto fotocommunity.de -->fotocommunity.de as a example, you will get not a single response on any picture. The benchmark is very low here onto Commons.--Makro Freak talk 22:24, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose - What I don't like in this picture is the extreme close-up, making only a small part of the wasp focused. But that is also a personnal preference I suppose. - Alvesgaspar 19:19, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Info - I like this "E.T. monster with helmet" effect... (J-Luc) 19:46 (UTC), 2007/07/02
- Support - Beautiful macro shot, great details in the eye zone, shallow depth of field is not really a problem here. Cropped wings are a bit annoying but is far from "killing the image". --Nattfodd 23:27, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- Support Winiar✉ 08:48, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose - Even most parts of the head are not really sharp. --wau > 22:51, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 21:10, 11 July 2007 (UTC)