Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Uvsun trace big.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Uvsun trace big.jpg - not featured
[edit]- Info created by (TRACE, NASA) - uploaded by olegivvit - nominated by Olegivvit
- Support --Olegivvit 09:35, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
- Support Nice photo, not very good qulity, but still nice in smaller verision. Moralist 11:58, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose --Gordo 18:20, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- Support Paulatz 09:10, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
- Support Sh@ry tales 17:41, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Wrong contrasting of colors, if bit changed would be really good foto. --Atlantas 09:04, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
- Support --MarkSweep 01:50, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
- Support Likeitsmyjob 04:56, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose low quality at full resolution. Poor patchwork. -- Lycaon 06:49, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Boereck 21:20, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
- Support -- Chosovi 12:48, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- Strong support Looks great for me. --Erina 22:08, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- Neutral — There are better ones. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] and there are higher-quality TIFFs of each. — Omegatron 01:01, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose --Leclerc 15:01, 29 August 2006 (UTC) Blocky, too visible that it is composed of more shots. And Omegatron is right, there are better ones, like this one he mentioned: [7]
- The photo you like is only in one color, the photo given here is in tree colors.
- This one is three colors, and higher quality. — Omegatron 12:36, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- Well, since it's from NASA, it should be PD ... maybe vote this one away, put the new one here and start voting again. 2100x2100 is good enough and it's sharp. --Leclerc 15:23, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- I guess not. Copyright notice. They might re-license one or two images though, if we asked. — Omegatron 18:14, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, I see ... Well, if they'll relicense [8] unser some acceptable license, it'll be great. do you think there are any chances? --Leclerc 19:00, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- Well, someone can certainly ask. — Omegatron 16:59, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, I see ... Well, if they'll relicense [8] unser some acceptable license, it'll be great. do you think there are any chances? --Leclerc 19:00, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- I guess not. Copyright notice. They might re-license one or two images though, if we asked. — Omegatron 18:14, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- Well, since it's from NASA, it should be PD ... maybe vote this one away, put the new one here and start voting again. 2100x2100 is good enough and it's sharp. --Leclerc 15:23, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- This one is three colors, and higher quality. — Omegatron 12:36, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- The photo you like is only in one color, the photo given here is in tree colors.
- Support Strange but interesting picture. Saproj 21:57, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
9 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured Roger McLassus 20:30, 9 September 2006 (UTC)