Commons:Featured picture candidates/Tree Canyonlands National Park edit.jpg

File:Tree Canyonlands National Park edit.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2009 at 15:04:54

Left

•  Info created & uploaded by Flicka - nominated by Richard Bartz (talk) 15:04, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Info Utah juniper (Juniperus osteosperma) with more saturation.
•  Support -- Richard Bartz (talk) 15:04, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Better colors but over-processed. Sharpening artifacts, the plants and rocks in the lower-left part look unnatural, like a painting. Sting (talk) 15:56, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Far better than the original nomination. Tiago Fioreze (talk) 15:59, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support--Mbz1 (talk) 19:23, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose agree with Sting --norro 20:06, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oversaturated →Diti the penguin — 20:54, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oversaturated It is ovesatured and unnatural. --Aktron (talk) 15:40, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose, extremely oversaturated. --Aqwis (talk) 10:24, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. --Karel (talk) 14:27, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Right

•  Support —kallerna™ 12:58, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose, visible JPEG artifacts. →Diti the penguin — 15:56, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose, as above. --Aqwis (talk) 10:24, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support nice composition. Amada44 (talk)

result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. --Karel (talk) 14:27, 16 March 2009 (UTC)