Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Louvre 2007 02 24 c.jpg

File:Louvre 2007 02 24 c.jpg (delist), delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2018 at 17:10:20

•  Info This 2007 image was superceded by a better, higher resolution version created by the same author in 2010. Referencing the Guidelines, "Normally there should never be two featured pictures that are just different versions of the same image, so if a better version exists the original version should be delisted." I believe these two images fit that situation and that, consequently, this one should be delisted. (Original nomination)
•  Delist -- Peulle (talk) 17:10, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Delist Charles (talk) 17:14, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Delist and it's really time someone goes shoot a better version :) - Benh (talk) 17:48, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

• Well, your 2010 pic is still pretty good. :) --Peulle (talk) 21:00, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

•  Delist - very straightforward comparison. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:06, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Delist per others. --Basotxerri (talk) 19:53, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Delist per others. Daniel Case (talk) 02:30, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Delist --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:57, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Delist --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:33, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Neutral The old one is still good for 2007. There will always be a better one, IMO no reason for delisting. --XRay ^talk 14:30, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

• Ehm ... actually, it's the other way around. Are you sure you've read the guidelines I linked to? You're talking about QIs: "The purpose of quality image status is to recognize that at the moment of creation, a Commons user skillfully achieved a desirable level of quality, a recognition that is not erased by later advances". For FPs, on the other hand, the point is exactly that: "The purpose of featured picture status is to recognize that an image is currently among the most valuable images—the top fraction of a percent. As overall image quality improves, some images will be delisted."--Peulle (talk) 16:24, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

I'm sure. The other one is a little bit better, yes. And I voted with "neutral" (not "keep") for this reason. IMO the new is a good FP, but it could be better too. --XRay ^talk 19:20, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 8 delist, 0 keep, 1 neutral => delisted. --A.Savin 10:54, 12 October 2018 (UTC)