Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Aerogel nasa.jpg

Info Doesn't meet the standards --Beyond silence 03:21, 13 August 2007 (UTC) ( (Original nomination)[reply]
Delist --Beyond silence 03:21, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No rationale for delisting offered. ~ trialsanderrors 06:02, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Aerogels of any size are almost strictly limited to NASA and JPL use (due to rarity), so it would be impossible to make a better shot for some time in the future. Adam Cuerden 20:35, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Rarity or not, it's not high enough quality and not special enough to compensate for the size, despite the difficulty of a shot. A lot of shots are difficult, but this one isn't special enough. -- Ram-Man 02:09, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Reluctant Keep. The resolution is really low, but the photo is still awesome. -- Slaunger 22:01, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Size should not be the only reason to delsit unless its only a thumbnail. --Digon3 ^talk 16:03, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Richard Bartz 19:09, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Seeder 18:56, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Even encyclopaedic value alone can make an image excellent, despite some technical flaws. This one is a fine example! --Herbert Ortner 16:11, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vladsinger 02:53, 23 August 2007 (UTC) This user needs to stop being so trigger happy on delist nominations that he doesn't have the time to provide a decent rationale for deletion before considering the inherent value of an image. This image is fine.[reply]

result: 8 Keep, 2 Delist, 0 neutral => not delisted. Simonizer 21:22, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu