Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Vitruvian.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Vitruvian.jpg, featured
[edit]- Info created by gallery.euroweb.hu - uploaded by Locutus Borg - nominated by El ComandanteHasta ∞ 21:39, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support Essential for encyclopaedic knowledge (FP in en.Wikipedia) El ComandanteHasta ∞ 21:39, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support - Gwir 08:52, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support Jon Harald Søby 10:45, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support -- Get_It (Talk) 00:26, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support --AngMoKio 09:19, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Golbez 17:26, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Luc Viatour 18:43, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support -- Anatol 22:04, 3 June 2006
- Support, good quality; famous picture. --tomf688 (talk - email) 20:43, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support
If you don't sign you can't vote. Sorry. Create you an account. El ComandanteHasta ∞ 07:44, 7 June 2006 (UTC)This unsigned vote was made by Bastique. --Mglanznig 15:34, 16 June 2006 (UTC) - Oppose Gérard Janot 12:21, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Rodge 20:52, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Way too much contrast. The colours are overdriven, i can see lots of green and red spots, that shouldn't be there. The previous version of this image (see revision history [1]) was better in my opinion. norro 19:20, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
- If there are green and red spots, in my opinion, it's because it's a very old paper... Hide these imperfections with a weak contrast, as it seems to be the case of the previous version, isn't a solution! It's an ancient document, and it must keep its imperfections. El ComandanteHasta ∞ 19:59, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
- Look at the top, there are colour artefacts all around the text. This is caused by increasing the contrast too much. The previous version seems to be closer to the original document. norro 16:27, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- OK, it could be better, but even if this version isn't perfect, I personnally think it's an outstanding picture of Commons. El ComandanteHasta ∞
- Look at the top, there are colour artefacts all around the text. This is caused by increasing the contrast too much. The previous version seems to be closer to the original document. norro 16:27, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- If there are green and red spots, in my opinion, it's because it's a very old paper... Hide these imperfections with a weak contrast, as it seems to be the case of the previous version, isn't a solution! It's an ancient document, and it must keep its imperfections. El ComandanteHasta ∞ 19:59, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 07:18, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support --ßøuñçêY2K 13:46, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support -- Lerdsuwa 13:16, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Result: 14 Support, 2 Oppose => featured Mglanznig 15:34, 16 June 2006 (UTC)