Commons:Valued image candidates/Épissure - 20150802 11h02 (10658).jpg

Épissure - 20150802 11h02 (10658).jpg

declined

Image
Nominated by	Medium69 You wanted talk to me? on 2015-12-18 13:52 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Eye splice, hung on a pole
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Comment Good photo, but the splice is diffficult to see without the annotation. I suggest that the image should be replaced by the top left-hand quarter of the image. An image 1000 pixels by 1500 pixels is well above the minimum needed for a VI (360 pixels by 480 pixels). @Martinvl: You are right, but I do not want to create another photo from it. Other users do just to have an IV, but it is not not my vision of the photo ... If you feel it is not worth a VI, feel free to vote against. --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 01:12, 19 December 2015 (UTC)  Oppose Scope too broad --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:56, 19 December 2015 (UTC)  Comment how type splice he exists? One ... how to better clarify a splice? --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 01:52, 20 December 2015 (UTC) Scope changed from Splice to Splice, hung on a pole --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 02:03, 20 December 2015 (UTC) Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn". Improved scope. --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 02:03, 20 December 2015 (UTC)  Comment It is forbidden to modify the votes. Only those who have to vote can do so. Otherwise, it's tampering. The scope is still too wide. But there is also a set design copyright problem that should be addressed with a competent administrator in this field. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:58, 20 December 2015 (UTC) @Archaeodontosaurus: Indeed, I have just seen in the rules that only positive votes are canceled by a change in scope. Negative votes remains valid. I really want to delve into the archives to find your own transgression of this rule. It does not matter, but I will be more vigilant for the future. Explain myself how the field is too broad ... By cons regarding alleged copyright issue, if you feel that there is a problem, do not hesitate to share the image deletion. A vote will be done ... But for me, no problems on that side. --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 11:23, 20 December 2015 (UTC)  Comment it seems to me that the image should be moved to the sub-category Category:Eye splices. Maybe that could help in finding a less broad scope as well? --El Grafo (talk) 12:08, 21 December 2015 (UTC) Thank you I changed the scope. --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 12:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC) Scope changed from Splice, hung on a pole to Eye splice, hung on a pole --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 12:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC) Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn". Result: 0 support, 1 oppose => declined. --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 16:21, 22 December 2015 (UTC)