Comment - There are a lot of photos of this clock with different crops. What are your criteria for best in scope? And is anything other than the dial, the numbers around it, and presumably the Latin dedication above it part of the clock per se? Are any of the statues part of the clock? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:02, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
There are several keys to reading. The materialistic view of the clock with the four quadrants around, but at the very beginning of the rebirth giving time is a political act that is claimed by the name of the doge Andrea Gritti; and as the people do not know how to read the emblem of the lion of Venice. And above all its material considerations the religious fact marked by a statue of Jesus Christ. Difficult to dissociate these different elements. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:08, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support - In those terms, this photo seems best in scope. However, if you have the chance, you might consider retaking the photo, so as to include Jesus' entire crown of thorns. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:17, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
