Oppose It looks good, but since it's not really comprehensible without the text, I'm not quite sure if it's valuable enough. It seems to try too hard for easy internationalisation, at the cost of clarity: it would probably be better if text was added to the image, and it was nominated as a Valued image set with multiple language versions. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:16, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I won't do that, sorry, I'm really convinced it is more valuable as it is now. Besides, image description is part of the value and part of the criteria: we don't print animal names on the pictures themselves... --Eusebius (talk) 21:23, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
