Commons:Valued image candidates/Middelburg (NL), Bevrijdingsmonument -- 2022 -- 4907.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Middelburg (NL), Bevrijdingsmonument -- 2022 -- 4907.jpg

promoted
Image
Nominated by XRay 💬 on 2022-11-21 14:15 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bevrijdingsmonument Middelburg
Used in

Global usage

Bevrijdingsmonument Middelburg (Q63068621)
Review
(criteria)

 Comment The nominated image is very good quality, but this other image is better at review size and is used in a Wiki article. --Tagooty (talk) 15:58, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but it has a viewpoint from the bottom and the resolution is lower. --XRay 💬 16:02, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The resolution is irrelevant to VIC and the size of the monument is so much lower at review size in the nominated photo. My only question would be whether the base is part of the monument. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:20, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
IMO it is. --XRay 💬 07:26, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, I'm liking File:Middelburg bevrijdingsmonument.jpg as most useful, but it is cut off at the bottom. So maybe File:Middelburg Monument 592 (4).JPG is most useful at review size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:47, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Best in Scope, weak support because in my humble opinion this photo gives the best over all impression of the monument. By showing a bit of surrounding, it gives an impression of the size of monument and because of the good view angle engravement of the base can be read best.--J. Lunau (talk) 18:35, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates/Middelburg_(NL),_Bevrijdingsmonument_--_2022_--_4907.jpg&oldid=711037150"