That's certainly reasonable. I used the more general "IllumiNations" because I don't believe that Commons has any photos of the older fireworks shows (which were also called IllumiNations) and so the "most valued" image for the current show would by default also be the "most valued" for the whole bunch. --bdesham★23:49, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm a bit ill-at-ease with it, since we have no way of telling whether the picture is representative of the previous IllumiNations shows or not. Besides, the globe is clearly visible on the picture, which may be specific to the recent show (but I cannot tell...). --Eusebius (talk) 09:12, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I really think you should include the link in the scope (like in my first comment, and without italic characters or any other typographic choice -- makes the scope portable). It is good practice now for VIs to link to the english WP (we plan to build an internationalization framework over it... in the long term) and it makes the explanation between parentheses unnecessary (thus keeping the scope rather short). --Eusebius (talk) 15:09, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
