Commons:Valued image candidates/Sempervivum x funckii, RBGE 2010, 2.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Sempervivum x funckii, RBGE 2010, 2.jpg

promoted
Image
Nominated by Lokal_Profil on 2011-04-17 16:19 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sempervivum × funckii, flower
Used in

Global usage

Spindelvävstaklök
Review
(criteria)

 Comment For full disclosure I should point out that Sempervivum x funckii might be the same species as Sempervivum funckii so those images should be considered too. /Lokal_Profil 16:19, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment The legend should not leave any ambiguity. Watch what is the common name that is synonymous. Change the categorization of the image accordingly. The scope for then applied to the flower. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:07, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment The problem is that the naming (and possibly whether they are the same plant) seems to be unresolved according to [1] and [2]. Until they have resolved the issue the image must be labelled Sempervivum x funckii as this is what the RBGE sign (and database) calls it. The disclosure was related to the fact that this might end up being the same plant as S. funckii/S.funkii so images of these (non of which are photographs of the flower) might be considered as counterarguments. /Lokal_Profil 15:20, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      •  Comment At closer inspection the situation seems to be the following. The name is either S. × funckii or S. funckii the two seem to be used in a mixed manner [3] uses the "×" but in turn links on to a page without it, both names refer to the same plant though. S. funkii is another entry altogether which might or might not be a synonym to the previous one. As a result I've categorised this image with Sempervivum funckii and added a comment in the descriotion that it is sometimes refered to as simply "Sempervivum funckii". As for the scope either name should work but I could change it to "Sempervivum funckii, flower" if only because that page already exists. /Lokal_Profil 15:40, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Support Thank you for such explanations. I think this picture is eligible in this scope, which is temporary. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:58, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky talk 05:09, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates/Sempervivum_x_funckii,_RBGE_2010,_2.jpg&oldid=54076471"