File talk:2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine.png
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
RSA
[edit]Can someone spell out RSA on the map, or define it in the description, for ease of use?—Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 02:38, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
- Done in the description. It means 'Regional State Administration', the name for the various governments of the oblasts. RGloucester (talk) 01:25, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Does that mean the official Ukrainian state administration or pro-Russian forces? In other words, is the area controlled by Ukraine or by the rebels? --Vitzque (talk) 11:16, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
- Done in the description. It means 'Regional State Administration', the name for the various governments of the oblasts. RGloucester (talk) 01:25, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Colours vs. description
[edit]Can someone fix the colours? They don´t match the description. Or if you think it would be better, you can fix the description instead. I don't care about Odessa, but if the colours don't match the description, the picture doesn't make sense. --Vachovec1 (talk) 23:23, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Kiev
[edit]Can someone update Kiev as there have been Pro-Russian protests in the city on June 30th. --KronosLine (talk) 16:23, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- Please provide a source for this. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:56, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- [1], I apologize for getting the date wrong, it is actually the 22nd of June. This has already been added to the 2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine page a long time ago. --KronosLine (talk) 18:49, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- 30 people rally in 3 million city: is it a notable 'protest'? Bogomolov.PL (talk) 19:52, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- [1], I apologize for getting the date wrong, it is actually the 22nd of June. This has already been added to the 2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine page a long time ago. --KronosLine (talk) 18:49, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- Not notable at all. RGloucester (talk) 19:55, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- Well it was notable enough to be included on the pro-Russian protests image, plus the legend for this file simply says "Pro-Russian protests" it doesn't say how big or small the protests have to be. We can't just ignore the protest that occurred. --KronosLine (talk) 20:02, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- It isn't a matter of "ignoring", it is a matter of significance. It is not significant enough to warrant shading it. RGloucester (talk) 20:15, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- In that case the legend should be changed to "Significant pro-Russian protests" as the current legend implies to include all occurring protests.. --KronosLine (talk) 20:21, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- If that's what we have to do to make you happy. Seeing that the line is admittedly arbitrary, but that most of us think that line is higher than 30, we could pick an arbitrary number of 100 or so and explicitly state that number. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:37, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
- In that case the legend should be changed to "Significant pro-Russian protests" as the current legend implies to include all occurring protests.. --KronosLine (talk) 20:21, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- It isn't a matter of "ignoring", it is a matter of significance. It is not significant enough to warrant shading it. RGloucester (talk) 20:15, 21 July 2014 (UTC)