File talk:BSicon mTHSTACCu.svg

I used to have  (mTHSTACCu) with a closed ACC station in the color like this icon  (ueHSTq), but now it is gone, and the "bad icon" fixers replaced it with an icon that was wrong twice over. j.reed (talk) 03:18, 31 August 2011 (UTC) (originally said here)

How is  (uemTHSTACCu) "wrong twice over"? Circéus (talk) 03:30, 31 August 2011 (UTC) (originally said here)

The icon that replaced it was  (emTHSTxu) an unused light rail line & station (the line operates, not the station), and the station was not marked as accessible, it is (wrong, twice). The one in your comment is wrong once, as the line colors are reversed, the vertical line is red, as that is the article it is being used in. The icon in your comment is being used correctly in the article for the ground level light rail line. The high level heavy rail Wikipedia:Atlantic City Line is currently using the second most correct icon available  (mTHSTACCu), but it needs the lighter blue unused station icon. J.reed (talk) 21:43, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

If I got it right, you need an icon like this (tower station of heavy under light across with disability access) but with closed facility and open lines? --Tuvalkin (talk) 03:33, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Light rail station at ground level with heavy rail station on elevated platform, both accessible, neither station operating, both lines operating. They're also separate fare systems, so that rules out the interchange icon. Basically,  (uemTHSTACCu) with the line colors reversed, since that is the icon used on the route diagram for the other line. I think would be  (emTHSTACCo). J.reed (talk) 21:43, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Isn't  (uemTHSTACCu) named incorrectly? Wikipedia:File_talk:BSicon_uemTHSTACCu.svg J.reed (talk) 22:03, 1 September 2011 (UTC)