File talk:India (orthographic projection).svg

Dear Ssolbergj, You have shown Jammu & Kashmir as partially claimed area by india but this is now authorised indivisible part of india. Please correct this Map at the earliest, and put jammu and kashmir as dark green. Thank you

Bias

Dear Ssolbergj, your map of China colors Arunachal Pradesh in light green (together with Taiwan)which implies it is somehow rather a part of CHina although under Indian administration. Why then doesn't the India map have Aksai Chin (a Chinese administered region claimed by India) be colored light green on the India map? Same goes with Pakistan occupied kashmir. Shouldn't those areas be in light green too? Please maintain neutrality as prescribed under Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. I look forward to you recoloring those maps with a NPOV in mind and not China slanted views. (Reference: [1] vs [2]. Thank you.

what is going on here? the update to showing the disputed territories in lighter gree was perfectly fine, and not a "map of Pakistan" as surreally claimed by the reverters. --Dbachmann (talk) 22:11, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

sorry for the flurry of self-reverts, I seem to be having caching problems. The correct versions is the 24 November one by Shibo77. This was reverted by Deepak on 15 November with the summary

if someone wants to mark PoK, then please do so properly and to scale instead of ruining the entire map

"PoK" is "Pakistan occupied Kashmir", obviously a term that would only be used by RoI patriots. Later, Tryphon reverted yet again, this time with a summary

if you want a map of Pakistan, please upload it with another name

indicating that this user has no idea what is being debated in the first place. I assume Deepak was trying to say the territory hadn't been marked properly. It would be ever so nice if people condescended to using talkpages instead of communicating via edit summary while revert warring. --Dbachmann (talk) 22:19, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, sorry about that. I got confused by the fact that someone changed the description from India to Pakistan, and thought that the modified map was related to this edit. Thanks for correcting it. --Tryphon (talk) 06:21, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

The map of India shows Kashmir (IoK-Indian occupied Kashmir)as part of India with the same dark green colour. The boundary between Himachal Paradesh should be marked to separate it from India. The entire area north of the Himachal Paradesh boundary should be shown in light green colour. 12 February 2010.

 

South Sudan

The map shows Sudan on its pre-2011 borders, leaving South Sudan with no place on the projection. Can anyone fix this? --Bankster (talk) 02:17, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Siachen Glacier

Siachen Glacier is in Jammu and Kashmir and controlled by India, (See terriotorial changes in the info box of the article Siachen conflict on Wikipedia, which states comes under control of India, continues to be disputed by Pakistan.) Pakistan's dispute is no matter, dark green is part controlled by India. Please fix. 2.51.22.135 07:51, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Noted, will request at Graphics Lab. King Prithviraj II (talk) 17:06, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Slight oversight in map's highlights

Map does not draw a border to denote the disputed Shaksgam Valley in the Kashmir region and likewise does not highlight the region light green. Should be fixed as the Shaksgam Valley is one of two parts in Kashmir that is subject to a China-India dispute (the other being Aksai Chin, which is already shown with borders and highlighted light green).

Jammu Kashmir

It is controlled by india Aethersizariya (talk) 03:58, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

This control is reflected in the map. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 02:05, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

FACT CHECK by - THE LONDON NEWS 24, London, Great Britain, United Kingdom: The Delhi High Court (New Delhi, India), has taken note of the "Wrong Map of India" being circulated by Wikipedia & WikiMedia Foundation, worldwide. This was followed by a Petition submitted to the Hon' High Court to highlight the issue of the maps designed by a user by with username: "Ssolbergj", with alleged involvement in anti-India activities and accused of spreading hate against people of Indian origin. The High Court on 7th September 2024, asked wikipedia to - "Wind up operations and exit the country, if wikipedia and wikimedia foundation don't like Indians and Indian democracy". London News 24 is closely following updates on this topic. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 61.0.48.219 (talk) 05:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)