File talk:Sexuality pearl necklace small.png
 | This file was nominated for deletion on November 14, 2006 but was kept. If you are thinking about re-nominating it for deletion, please read that discussion first. |
| This file was nominated for deletion on January 17, 2007 but was kept. If you are thinking about re-nominating it for deletion, please read that discussion first. |
| This file was nominated for deletion on August 19, 2008 but was kept. If you are thinking about re-nominating it for deletion, please read that discussion first. |
| This file was nominated for deletion on December 11, 2008 but was kept. If you are thinking about re-nominating it for deletion, please read that discussion first. |
Image
[edit]
I'm not so sure that this image really demonstrates a pearl necklace very well. Every time that I have ever given a woman a pearl necklace, it has looked like an actual necklace, i.e. it flowed from between the breasts around the neck. This looks more like a "pearl choker" --72.75.108.135 07:43, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- Upload of a better image to replace this one is always welcome. --Morten LJ 06:52, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
model age, assumptions, and the side of caution
[edit]
As I've seen mentioned in the deletion discussions above, the strong likelihood that this is a simple copyright violation from another website is insufficient grounds for deletion. Further, the requirement under US law ('Section 2257') for every entity which "publishes, reproduces, or reissues" explicit material" to have (and produce when asked) proof of age of every model, is not deemed applicable to this project, by this community, nor do the foundation require such records, at this time. I believe this is a flawed approach on many levels, and is unsustainable, I further believe that without a higher confidence factor as to the model's age (we currently 'assume good faith' on the part of the uploader) the image should be deleted. Privatemusings (talk) 23:37, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
